Re: On orbit assembly? Zero gee means no design-ahead? What?

From: Spike Jones (spike66@attglobal.net)
Date: Wed Mar 07 2001 - 00:16:51 MST

Next message: Adrian Tymes: "Re: Anti-extropianism in the new Star Trek"
Previous message: Ian Goddard: "Re: Mercury Risk?"
In reply to: Michael M. Butler: "On orbit assembly? Zero gee means no design-ahead? What?"
Next in thread: Adrian Tymes: "Re: On orbit assembly? Zero gee means no design-ahead? What?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

> ["Michael M. Butler" doesnt] expect everything to be bug free in
> version 1.0. And I don't have all the answers. But there's (for
> instance) a propulsion weenie on this list, and I'd trust him to not
> fsck up that part too badly. :)

That would be Doug Jones. Compared to him Im a
nanoweenie. {8^D spike

Next message: Adrian Tymes: "Re: Anti-extropianism in the new Star Trek"
Previous message: Ian Goddard: "Re: Mercury Risk?"
In reply to: Michael M. Butler: "On orbit assembly? Zero gee means no design-ahead? What?"
Next in thread: Adrian Tymes: "Re: On orbit assembly? Zero gee means no design-ahead? What?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Nov 02 2002 - 08:06:15 MST