Re: Latin verbs (was: Re: Hal on Science versus Religion)

From: Eugene Leitl (Eugene.Leitl@lrz.uni-muenchen.de)
Date: Tue Mar 06 2001 - 02:28:34 MST

Next message: Brian D Williams: "Re: power line risk corroborated"
Previous message: scerir: "Re: Eliezer on Science versus Religion"
In reply to: Anders Sandberg: "Re: Latin verbs (was: Re: Hal on Science versus Religion)"
Next in thread: Mark Walker: "Anders on Hal on Science versus Religion"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

On 6 Mar 2001, Anders Sandberg wrote:

> I was of course referring to Tertullianus' irrationalism, but I must
> admit the mistake has a certain charm for a worldbuilder like me...

Hey! You will invite us for the first walk-through, right?
______________________________________________________________
ICBMTO : N48 10'07'' E011 33'53'' http://www.lrz.de/~ui22204
57F9CFD3: ED90 0433 EB74 E4A9 537F CFF5 86E7 629B 57F9 CFD3

Next message: Brian D Williams: "Re: power line risk corroborated"
Previous message: scerir: "Re: Eliezer on Science versus Religion"
In reply to: Anders Sandberg: "Re: Latin verbs (was: Re: Hal on Science versus Religion)"
Next in thread: Mark Walker: "Anders on Hal on Science versus Religion"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Nov 02 2002 - 08:06:14 MST