From: KPJ (kpj@sics.se)
Date: Tue Feb 06 2001 - 03:10:11 MST
It appears as if <hal@finney.org> wrote:
|
|I think this is less likely to have as much impact as public cameras, for
|a few reasons. First, the current trend is towards public installations,
|and police cameras will have more impact on people's behavior than illegal
|peeping toms. Second, the technological improvements necessary to have
|cameras that would be this small and yet still have power, transmitting
|and/or recording capabilities will take longer than those for stationary
|and human carried cameras. And third, by the time you have insect-sized
|cameras invading people's homes there may be technological countermeasures
|that are possible.
1. Lucky people live in jurisdictions where the police may not snoop on them.
This does not hold in most places on the planet.
2. The insect-sized cameras and bugs exist today.
3. The insect-sized cameras and bugs exist today.
So.. what technological countermeasures do not know of, apart from Tempest
techniques, physical access control, and the traditional bug hunting?
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Nov 02 2002 - 08:05:38 MST