Re: true abundance?

From: John Marlow (johnmarlow@gmx.net)
Date: Mon Jan 29 2001 - 22:49:39 MST


Heh. Or how's this for you: Faced with the Contact scenario choice--
send a man or a woman to First Contact, which would you choose?

(I'd lean toward man, to avoid giving them a look at the female
reproductive system--assuming they didn't know where we came from.)

Religious or nonreligious?

(I'd send nonreligious, every time; wouldn't want irrational
beliefs/destruction of same coloring judgement or actions.)

On the other hand, women tend to be more interested in true
understanding and less inclined to macho sh*theadedness...

jm

On 29 Jan 2001, at 20:54, Spike Jones wrote:

> Who recalls the name of the sci-fi writer who was asked if
> women should be allowed to be astronauts? He replied
> that all astronauts should be women, since they have a
> higher intelligence to weight ratio.
>
> The response drew a laugh from the audience, but the
> point is extremely valid, and would make a compelling
> case for a mission where weight really counts. spike
>

John Marlow



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Nov 02 2002 - 08:05:27 MST