Re: No US Federal parole, was Re: Say what? was Re: true abundance?

From: James Rogers (jamesr@best.com)
Date: Mon Jan 29 2001 - 16:16:55 MST

Next message: S.J. Van Sickle: "Re: No federal parole"
Previous message: Samantha Atkins: "Re: true abundance?"
In reply to: Samantha Atkins: "Re: No US Federal parole, was Re: Say what? was Re: true abundance?"
Next in thread: J. R. Molloy: "ROBOT: Jobs for the bots"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

At 03:04 PM 1/29/2001 -0800, Samantha Atkins wrote:

>So what precisely is a "federal offender"?

An employee or agent of the Federal government you find offensive?

-James Rogers
jamesr@best.com

Next message: S.J. Van Sickle: "Re: No federal parole"
Previous message: Samantha Atkins: "Re: true abundance?"
In reply to: Samantha Atkins: "Re: No US Federal parole, was Re: Say what? was Re: true abundance?"
Next in thread: J. R. Molloy: "ROBOT: Jobs for the bots"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Nov 02 2002 - 08:05:26 MST