Re: Velikovsky's was an imbecile

From: BigBooster (fm1@amug.org)
Date: Thu Jan 18 2001 - 00:23:50 MST


See 'Scientists Confront Velikovsky' edited by Donald Goldsmith;
Foreword by Isaac Asimov; includes chapter by Carl Sagan.

Frederick Mann

At 12:48 AM 01/18/2001 -0500, you wrote:
>John Marlow <johnmarlow@gmx.net> Wrote:
>
> > I do not support Velikovsky, am not in fact familiar enough with his
> > works to render an opinion one way or the other
>
>You don't have an opinion?! You don't have an opinion about Jupiter
>spiting out a comet
>that then came near the earth and then caused the Red Sea to part and then
>went into
>a circular orbit around the sun and then became the planet Venus ?! You
>think this matter
>is actually worth further investigation?! Neutrality on stupidity of this
>colossal magnitude is
>inexcusable and unforgivable.
>
> >You, on the other hand, have studied the matter carefully, I'm sure.
>
>Yes, I've studied Velikovsky, I can say with confidence that I've given
>the man all the time he
>deserved, about 4.3 seconds.
>
> John K Clark jonkc@att.net
>
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Nov 02 2002 - 08:04:59 MST