Re: more on Brand and the Singularity idea

From: Charlie Stross (charlie@antipope.org)
Date: Mon Jan 15 2001 - 14:14:51 MST


On Mon, Jan 15, 2001 at 02:18:12PM +0100, Anders Sandberg wrote:
> Eugene.Leitl@lrz.uni-muenchen.de writes:
>
> > Duh. I wonder who stuck a "Kick me" sticker to our collective backs.
>
> We did it.
 
Bingo. Hole in one.

> As long as we spend more time debating weird concepts internally (and
> hence locking others out by sheer incomprehensibility) than getting
> our ideas into the mainstream of thinking, we will look like a cult to
> many.

Let me add to this: the unbounded techno-optimism is out of step with
popular culture, and sometimes veers dangerously close to a Panglossian
refusal to face the possibility that there is a downside to all this
stuff. I'm not advocating luddism here: it's just that any new technology
tends to come with misapplications as well as advantages, and sometimes
the vehement insistence that _of course_ the benefits outweigh the costs
appears facile and stupid. Especially when talking about technologies
(example: molecular nanotechnology) where the benefits are major, but
the worst possible case down-side is catastrophic (i.e. total extinction).

Pure unadulterated optimism, to put it bluntly, is unrealistic -- and
everybody knows it.

-- Charlie

"I hope we shall crush in its birth the aristocracy of our monied
corporations which dare already to challenge our government to a trial
of strength, and bid defiance to the laws our country."
                                                      -- Thomas Jefferson, 1816



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Nov 02 2002 - 08:04:54 MST