Re: Paradox--was Re: Active shields, was Re: Criticism depth, was Re: Homework, Nuke, etc..
From: xgl (xli03@emory.edu)
Date: Sun Jan 14 2001 - 08:15:41 MST
- Next message: Joe Dees: "Re: what is IT?"
- Previous message: Harvey Newstrom: "Re: what is IT?"
- In reply to: John Marlow: "Re: Paradox--was Re: Active shields, was Re: Criticism depth, was Re: Homework, Nuke, etc.."
- Next in thread: Eliezer S. Yudkowsky: "Re: Paradox--was Re: Active shields, was Re: Criticism depth, was Re: Homework, Nuke, etc.."
- Reply: Eliezer S. Yudkowsky: "Re: Paradox--was Re: Active shields, was Re: Criticism depth, was Re: Homework, Nuke, etc.."
- Reply: John Marrek: "Re: Paradox--was Re: Active shields, was Re: Criticism depth, was Re: Homework, Nuke, etc.."
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
[ attachment ]
On Sat, 13 Jan 2001, John Marlow wrote:
> >
> > On this planet *right now* there exists enough
> > networked computing power
> > to create an AI.
>
> **Now, forgive me if I've missed something here
> (please point it out)--but isn't AI a matter of
> quality rather than quantity?
>
since intelligence is not an atomic essence but an emergent
property, sufficient computational capacity is one of its pre-requisites;
not only does more computational capacity make intelligence easier,
without enough computational capacity, intelligence would probably be
*impossible*. i take this to be eliezer's point here.
>
> while
> > success in nanotechnology doesn't help AI. In fact,
> > nanotechnology
> > provides for computers with thousands or millions of
> > times the power of a
> > single human brain, at which point it takes no
> > subtlety, no knowledge, no
> > wisdom to create AI; anyone with a nanocomputer can
> > just brute-force it.
>
> **See above--quality v quantity (brute-force).
>
ditto.
-x
- Next message: Joe Dees: "Re: what is IT?"
- Previous message: Harvey Newstrom: "Re: what is IT?"
- In reply to: John Marlow: "Re: Paradox--was Re: Active shields, was Re: Criticism depth, was Re: Homework, Nuke, etc.."
- Next in thread: Eliezer S. Yudkowsky: "Re: Paradox--was Re: Active shields, was Re: Criticism depth, was Re: Homework, Nuke, etc.."
- Reply: Eliezer S. Yudkowsky: "Re: Paradox--was Re: Active shields, was Re: Criticism depth, was Re: Homework, Nuke, etc.."
- Reply: John Marrek: "Re: Paradox--was Re: Active shields, was Re: Criticism depth, was Re: Homework, Nuke, etc.."
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
[ attachment ]
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5
: Sat Nov 02 2002 - 08:04:52 MST