Re: Philosophy: It doesn't suck so bad we can't ignore it (and Harvey)

From: Emlyn (emlyn@one.net.au)
Date: Sun Jan 07 2001 - 01:06:53 MST

Next message: Gina Miller: "Re: headless horseman"
Previous message: Emlyn: "Re: Riddles (was: Lateral Thinking)"
In reply to: J. R. Molloy: "Re: Philosophy: It doesn't suck so bad we can't ignore it (and Harvey)"
Next in thread: Jason Joel Thompson: "Re: Philosophy: It doesn't suck so bad we can't ignore it"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

A postmodernist, I knew it.

Emlyn

J R Molloy wrote
> So, it's your philosophy that these postings are content-free. Who died
> and made you the Big Kahuna of content evaluation?

Next message: Gina Miller: "Re: headless horseman"
Previous message: Emlyn: "Re: Riddles (was: Lateral Thinking)"
In reply to: J. R. Molloy: "Re: Philosophy: It doesn't suck so bad we can't ignore it (and Harvey)"
Next in thread: Jason Joel Thompson: "Re: Philosophy: It doesn't suck so bad we can't ignore it"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Nov 02 2002 - 08:04:36 MST