From: Technotranscendence (neptune@mars.superlink.net)
Date: Sat Dec 30 2000 - 20:14:59 MST
On Saturday, December 30, 2000 12:08 PM Adrian Tymes wingcat@pacbell.net
wrote:
> (This is why, if I ever do a space
> company, I will try to have a home-built launcher that I've actually
> flown *before* going out for funding. A development process that
> requires $millions before doing the first non-simulated test is not as
> likely to produce results as one that does not.)
Sounds like a capitol idea to me. I don't see why these guys don't use
off-the-shelf boosters, engines, and such.
> > Go nanotech!
>
> Go buisness model! I honestly don't see where the material and
> manufacturing tech ever held these ventures up, so much as the fact
> that they never got around to *using* even the cheap stuff that's out
> there.
I agree. While I'm very enthusiast for nanotechnology, I don't make it into
my mantra for whenever I get into a bind. (The same applies to the
Singularity.)
Cheers!
Daniel Ust
http://uweb.superlink.net/neptune/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:32:36 MST