From: Eugene.Leitl@lrz.uni-muenchen.de
Date: Tue Nov 28 2000 - 13:51:41 MST
hal@finney.org writes:
> The target percentage was 75%, which is about what the first couple of
> chapters pulled in. Apparently it has been falling since then.
>
> Sounds like we need to go back to the drawing boards to come up with a
> new idea to pay for IP. Anyone who has sat through the annoying pledge
> breaks on PBS will know that it's not easy to get people to pay for
> something they can get for free.
I think it failed for obvious reasons. The target percentage of 75% is
arbitrary, and rather high. The price was also way too high (1-2$
would have been more like it, and ~100% should have gone to the
original artist), the threshold wasn't as simple as a single
mouseclick.
I still think that Damien B. et al. would be better off with a
voluntary payment scheme. If you like artist's stuff, you don't want
to seem him starve, quite the opposite.
But we will see soon enough how it all will pan out.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:32:07 MST