Re: greens for browne

From: Alex Future Bokov (alexboko@umich.edu)
Date: Sat Oct 14 2000 - 08:44:52 MDT


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

On Fri, 13 Oct 2000, Spike Jones wrote:

> So, Mike, you are absolutely right, dammit. {8-[ The logical
> thing for a pragmatic Green to do is to vote Democrat and campaign
> for and donate to Browne, while the most logical thing for a pragmatic
> Libertarian to do is to vote Republican and donate to Darth
> Nader. Libertarians for eco-totalitarianism. Greens for Browne.
> Ill be damned.
>
> What am I missing? spike

What if I really, honestly, after much soul-searching, see a perfectly
equal lack of benefit in either a Republican or a Democrat being
elected? Furthermore, what if by campaigining for the Greens, I
energize that party and it has even more leverage and self-confidence
in the next election? To a third party, just having a decent showing
in the polls is a partial victory. In my mind, it's Browne running
against Nader, and I want Browne to go on record as getting more votes.

PS: Guess what my Halloween costume is going to be this year? I'll go
as a Republicrat. I'll contact-cement together half a Gore mask to half
a Bush mask, and give the other halves to some housemate of mine so
they could go a my arch-nemesis, the Demopulican.

- --

NSA Waco Cherokee
Why are the above words in my signature? Check out:
http://www.echelon.wiretapped.net

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 6.5.1

iQBpAwUBOehxZpvUJaRNHMexAQFONgKaAp+kRbk4Xtb10fNFJbvPfFmU4aU7T87Y
qjYUB9dlYgYxZMIpGEc4LndflgHuEtKB1zclxsWxQL59e+deAgN0uGwuLt9wP1iX
T4wIBYSYH27OYdHb
=Lf4w
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:31:36 MST