Re: Why wouldn't friendly AI leave fundies in the dust?

From: Samantha Atkins (samantha@objectent.com)
Date: Sat Sep 30 2000 - 01:31:20 MDT

Next message: Samantha Atkins: "Re: Eugene's nuclear threat"
Previous message: Samantha Atkins: "Re: Why wouldn't friendly AI leave fundies in the dust?"
In reply to: J. R. Molloy: "Why wouldn't friendly AI leave fundies in the dust?"
Reply: Eliezer S. Yudkowsky: "Re: Why wouldn't friendly AI leave fundies in the dust?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

"J. R. Molloy" wrote:
>
> Samantha Atkins sniffs,
>
> > Uh, excuse me, but that attitude is just as bad as that of any
> > eschatologically minded fundie.
>
> Yeah, it's just as "bad" because you define "bad" according to the belief system
> installed in you by the establishment and your own biology.
>

OK. I won't waste any more time attempting to communicate with a
mindless loose cannon. Have fun.

- samantha

Next message: Samantha Atkins: "Re: Eugene's nuclear threat"
Previous message: Samantha Atkins: "Re: Why wouldn't friendly AI leave fundies in the dust?"
In reply to: J. R. Molloy: "Why wouldn't friendly AI leave fundies in the dust?"
Reply: Eliezer S. Yudkowsky: "Re: Why wouldn't friendly AI leave fundies in the dust?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:31:18 MST