Re: Do we differ more on values or facts?

From: Jason Joel Thompson (jasonjthompson@home.com)
Date: Wed Sep 06 2000 - 15:21:23 MDT


----- Original Message -----
From: "Stirling Westrup" <sti@cam.org>

a Popperian falsificationist. To me, facts are predictive theories
> about outcomes of experiments which have been tested and have so far
> failed to be disproved. As far as I am concerned almost nothing matches
> your criteria for a fact, since nothing non-trivial can be proven true,
> and it is thus not a useful definition.

Well spoken. From what does Popperian falsificationism derive?

--
   ::jason.joel.thompson::
   ::founder::
    www.wildghost.com


This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:30:49 MST