From: natashavita@earthlink.net
Date: Mon Jul 24 2000 - 15:41:31 MDT
--- Original Message ---
Anders Sandberg <asa@nada.kth.se> Wrote on
24 Jul 2000 22:38:55 +0200
>Yes, I really liked it when I read it. Has anybody actually
tried to use it?<
Yes, in a state of creative continuity where one concept leads
to the next as if building a matrix of data. I found similar
experiences with zen-in-the-art-of-free-fall-expression.
>Transhumanism as species relativism?<
Could be too narrow, perhaps, in that I may not hold all truths
of transhumanists. Also, if such distinction depends on the
limited nature of the mind, I might bolt on this point because,
although the mind today is indeed limited, I do not assume that
such limitation will be its nature.
>Multispeciesism?<
Then species would be understood in a new way because species
are potentially capable of interbreeding and late-transhumans
may have other methods of reproduction dissimilar to early-transhuman
interbreeding. What I like about this concept is the open slate
of possibilities for breeding, whether post-bio physical or for
mental replications.
Natasha
-----
Sent using MailStart.com ( http://MailStart.Com/welcome.html )
The FREE way to access your mailbox via any web browser, anywhere!
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:30:09 MST