Re: Thought love- (was) Madison Ave.Love (was) True love may be

From: hal@finney.org
Date: Thu Jul 13 2000 - 15:33:31 MDT

• Next message: Robin Hanson: "Re: No AI for Nano/No Nano for copyloads"
• Previous message: Robin Hanson: "Re: No AI for Nano/No Nano for copyloads"
• Maybe in reply to: QueeneMUSE@aol.com: "Re: Thought love- (was) Madison Ave.Love (was) True love may be"
• Next in thread: Dana Hedberg: "Re: Thought love- (was) Madison Ave.Love (was) True love may be"
• Reply: Dana Hedberg: "Re: Thought love- (was) Madison Ave.Love (was) True love may be"
• Reply: Lee Daniel Crocker: "Re: Thought love- (was) Madison Ave.Love (was) True love may be"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

> The original study which threw this into mainstream media was done by a
> self-proclaimed obscure molecular genetecist named Dean Hamer...

What exactly is "a self-proclaimed obscure molecular geneticist"?
Do you mean, he proclaimed, "I am an obscure molecular geneticist?"
Why would he have said that?

Hal

• Next message: Robin Hanson: "Re: No AI for Nano/No Nano for copyloads"
• Previous message: Robin Hanson: "Re: No AI for Nano/No Nano for copyloads"
• Maybe in reply to: QueeneMUSE@aol.com: "Re: Thought love- (was) Madison Ave.Love (was) True love may be"
• Next in thread: Dana Hedberg: "Re: Thought love- (was) Madison Ave.Love (was) True love may be"
• Reply: Dana Hedberg: "Re: Thought love- (was) Madison Ave.Love (was) True love may be"
• Reply: Lee Daniel Crocker: "Re: Thought love- (was) Madison Ave.Love (was) True love may be"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:29:55 MST