From: Anders Sandberg (asa@nada.kth.se)
Date: Wed Jun 21 2000 - 16:23:09 MDT
"\[ Robert-Coyote \]" <coyyote@hotmail.com> writes:
> Do we need to qualify our choice of with a number of variables ?
>
> how's this for a start...
>
> close enough to a trauma center
> close enough to a cryonics facility
> a legal venue providing for obtainable life extending services and
> substances
>
> low ambient radiation (radon, ultraviolet, etc.)
> practical commuting distance to sustain an adequate income (if that is
> necessary for how one creates wealth)
>
> Location provides efficient means to access new life extending information
> (i.e. internet)
>
> anything else ?
It seems that your criteria are mainly about avoiding death well
rather than living well. While the above are certainly a big plus for
any location, it would hardly be the central issues if I wanted to
move anywhere. My list of criteria would instead center around the
density of interesting people, information sources and events in the
vicinity. "Best" is after all a highly subjective thing.
-- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Anders Sandberg Towards Ascension! asa@nada.kth.se http://www.nada.kth.se/~asa/ GCS/M/S/O d++ -p+ c++++ !l u+ e++ m++ s+/+ n--- h+/* f+ g+ w++ t+ r+ !y
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:29:21 MST