Re: ART: What Art Is

From: Technotranscendence (neptune@mars.superlink.net)
Date: Sun May 28 2000 - 12:54:58 MDT

• Next message: Zero Powers: "PHIL: Egoism (Was ART: What Art Is)"
• Previous message: QueeneMUSE@aol.com: "Re: ART: What Art Is"
• In reply to: QueeneMUSE@aol.com: "Re: ART: What Art Is"
• Next in thread: QueeneMUSE@aol.com: "Re: ART: What Art Is"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

On Sunday, May 28, 2000 8:27 AM QueeneMUSE@aol.com wrote:
> Ayn Rand was ill qualified to define art.

Why? What would make one qualified in this area?

Does QueeneMUSE know Rand's definition of art? Or why she takes a stand
against Modern Art? (I should mention, not all Objectivists and fellow
travelers agree with Rand's stance here.)

Cheers!

Daniel Ust
http://uweb.superlink.net/neptune/

• Next message: Zero Powers: "PHIL: Egoism (Was ART: What Art Is)"
• Previous message: QueeneMUSE@aol.com: "Re: ART: What Art Is"
• In reply to: QueeneMUSE@aol.com: "Re: ART: What Art Is"
• Next in thread: QueeneMUSE@aol.com: "Re: ART: What Art Is"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:28:51 MST