From: Technotranscendence (neptune@mars.superlink.net)
Date: Sun May 28 2000 - 10:58:47 MDT
On Saturday, May 27, 2000 8:37 PM Dan Adams danadams@yahoo.com wrote:
> I'm gonna have to recant and go with you on that point
> Daniel - good rebut!
No problem, but emotionally charged debate on this might have been
interesting.:)
Fopr the record, I think books like _What Art Is_ will do more for making
Objectivism a better philosophy. Critical examination -- as opposed to
uncritical acceptence or uncritical rejection -- is _the_ way.
Cheers!
Daniel Ust
http://uweb.superlink.net/neptune/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:28:51 MST