From: Michael S. Lorrey (mike@datamann.com)
Date: Wed May 24 2000 - 08:35:45 MDT
Ian Goddard wrote:
> At 04:16 PM 05/23/2000 -0700, Joe Dees wrote:
>
> >Just as I said - whoever's opinions the test results cut against will
> >denounce them as either incompetent or dishonest or both.
>
> IAN: Well, if the situation was reversed and the debris
> had been placed on "white hot" ground, obscuring almost
> all reflections, and the gunshots were placed over "black
> cold" ground, emphasizing them, it would be a legitimate
> grievance that there should not be different backgrounds.
> Making one phenomena invisible and another exceptionally
> visible is exactly contrary to examining their similarity.
> Nobody should be asked to accept that Waco FLIR flashes
> are not gunshots based on a videotape of gunshots placed
> up against a bright background, obscuring them to nothing.
Joe isn't interested in the thruth, Ian, he's interested in being right.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:28:48 MST