From: Mike Steven (mikesteven@ndirect.co.uk)
Date: Tue May 23 2000 - 13:17:08 MDT
Martin Ling wrote:
> On Tue, May 23, 2000 at 03:46:39PM +0100, Mike Steven wrote:
> >
> > And as for Martin Ling's comments:
> >
> > "It's not stealing if those people have agreed to pay. Which,
technically,
> > they have. By remaining in the country, and by
> > upholding the government and its taxation policies."
> >
> > I'm sorry, but this is ludicrous. The fact that I haven't emigrated is
in
> > no way an endorsement of government theft of my money. I didn't vote
for
> > them and the only reason I "agree to pay" (to use your terminology) is
> > because if I don't, my property itself will be stolen or I'll be
imprisoned.
>
> I *know* this is ludicrous, and it was intended to be obvious as such.
> See my next paragraph, in which I point out Michael for using this kind
> of reasoning with regard to political dissidents being mistreated by the
> government.
Hi Martin,
Apologies if I was a bit slow on the uptake and misinterpreted your
position. In my defense, sarcasm isn't always the easiest thing to pick up
on in the absence of any audio cues.
Mike
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:28:47 MST