From: Michael S. Lorrey (retroman@turbont.net)
Date: Sun May 21 2000 - 15:46:46 MDT
QueeneMUSE@aol.com wrote:
>
> People are assumng something that I can't assume, which is that in a totally
> transparent, surveillanced society that courts would exist in the way they do
> now.
>
> I think they'd be nearly obsolete.
>
> If every act was archived, every action known by all, prosecutors, lawyers
> and judges would have to go the way of the dodo.For this reason alone, it
> couldn't happen, since lawyers need jobs as much as criminals do.
>
> The way it is today, these kinds of arguments find wieght. When everything is
> known what good will lying or contesting do?
With such technology comes the technology to counterfeit surveillance
data.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:28:44 MST