Re: Is the fourth time is the charm?

From: QueeneMUSE@aol.com
Date: Fri May 19 2000 - 10:26:02 MDT

• Next message: John Clark: "Re: Is the fourth time is the charm?"
• Previous message: John Clark: "Re: Is the fourth time is the charm?"
• Maybe in reply to: John Clark: "Is the fourth time is the charm?"
• Next in thread: John Clark: "Re: Is the fourth time is the charm?"
• Reply: John Clark: "Re: Is the fourth time is the charm?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

just a question. Is there a point to this "original=not original" thread, or
is it like A = not A - just a conundrum?
When I say point, I mean what is the intent behind being right abou the
result. What is the meaning .. if resolution occurs.
What is the "application" if any?

• Next message: John Clark: "Re: Is the fourth time is the charm?"
• Previous message: John Clark: "Re: Is the fourth time is the charm?"
• Maybe in reply to: John Clark: "Is the fourth time is the charm?"
• Next in thread: John Clark: "Re: Is the fourth time is the charm?"
• Reply: John Clark: "Re: Is the fourth time is the charm?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:28:42 MST