Re: Spiritual is not Mystic - (was Pedantry)

From: QueeneMUSE@aol.com
Date: Wed May 17 2000 - 18:20:06 MDT

• Next message: Brian Atkins: "Re: Possible meeting around Palo Alto conference?"
• Previous message: E. Shaun Russell: "Sasha: A Musical Tribute"
• Maybe in reply to: QueeneMUSE@aol.com: "Spiritual is not Mystic - (was Pedantry)"
• Next in thread: matthew gream: "Re: Spiritual is not Mystic - (was Pedantry)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

In a message dated 5/17/2000 1:53:31 PM Pacific Daylight Time, lee@piclab.com
writes:

> Those most
> competent in a field are generally content to give their opinions as if
> they are "obvious" rather than giving them value because of their source.
Sounds like Eugene when he speaks of cryo -protectants ; ) ; ) ; )

• Next message: Brian Atkins: "Re: Possible meeting around Palo Alto conference?"
• Previous message: E. Shaun Russell: "Sasha: A Musical Tribute"
• Maybe in reply to: QueeneMUSE@aol.com: "Spiritual is not Mystic - (was Pedantry)"
• Next in thread: matthew gream: "Re: Spiritual is not Mystic - (was Pedantry)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:28:40 MST