Re:art&science

From: scerir@libero.it
Date: Mon Apr 17 2000 - 10:36:41 MDT

Next message: Technotranscendence: "Re: Harry BrownE"
Previous message: Michael S. Lorrey: "Re: reaction to Microsoft ruling"
Maybe in reply to: matthew gream: "art&science"
Next in thread: Skye: "Re: art&science"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

References, just old references
about modern art & modern science (physics)

Is this field a bit dated? Dated?

Is beauty dated? In extropian space?

<Beauty will save the Earth. What kind of beauty will save the
Earth?> (F. Dostojevskij, The Idiot)

scerir@libero.it

Rome (Italy), 17.04.00, 18.33 local time

http://www.physics.wm.edu/~larsen/monroe.html

http://www.redbull.demon.co.uk/ideas/artsci.htm

http://www.physics.ucla.edu/class/85HC_Gruner/

http://mitpress.mit.edu/e-journals/Leonardo/isast/spec.projects/art
%26sciencebib.html

http://www2.eng.cam.ac.uk/~tpl/texts/science.html

http://www.ucl.ac.uk/sts/millerai/insights.htm

http://www.redbull.demon.co.uk/bibliography/essays/edinb.htm

http://faculty.washington.edu/eckman/mod/0397/0173.html

Next message: Technotranscendence: "Re: Harry BrownE"
Previous message: Michael S. Lorrey: "Re: reaction to Microsoft ruling"
Maybe in reply to: matthew gream: "art&science"
Next in thread: Skye: "Re: art&science"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:28:03 MST