From: Peter C. McCluskey (pcm@rahul.net)
Date: Mon Apr 17 2000 - 09:18:06 MDT
max@maxmore.com (Max More) writes:
>>player in those areas too. I don't think you can seriously believe
>>that they've accomplished this success based solely on the technical
>>merits of their products.
>
>Oh really? Then would you care to explain how Microsoft managed to achieve
>an even larger share of the office suite market on the MacOS than on its
>own OS?
There are more plausible hypotheses than I would care to list. Your
observation only rules out a small portion of the ones that have been
proposed.
>I'd have to dig out the authors and their book, but at a Cato/Forbes ASAP
>conference, I saw it convincingly demonstrated that Microsoft's success in
>each area of software directly correlated with the comparative quality of
>their products according to computer magazine reviews. (For instance,
Each area that they chose to study. As far as I recall, they didn't study
some important areas such as operating systems.
Showing that such a correlation exists only shows that technical competence
was one of the strategies they used, not that it was their sole strategy.
-- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Peter McCluskey | The US Idea Futures Exchange: speculate on http://www.rahul.net/pcm | political,financial issues at http://www.usifex.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:28:03 MST