From: Stirling Westrup (sti@cam.org)
Date: Mon Apr 17 2000 - 08:49:17 MDT
Spike Jones wrote:
> > EvMick@aol.com wrote: > Hot hydrogen or a vacumn?
> >
> > Stirling Westrup wrote:
> > Then again, by the time the weight of the displaced air was close that of
> > your bathysphere, we're talking holding out some SERIOUS pressure. It
> > looks like you'd want a diamondoid sheath in order to be practical at
> > all.
>
> Why all that? Just take some hydrogen down with you below the
> hydrogen layer and match the hydrogen pressure in the baloon with the
> pressure of the heavier gas you are displacing. Engineering-wise, the
> problem is not all that different from building a blimp on this planet.
Except that on this planet you don't worry about the atmosphere leaking
in. In fact, you don't worry about too many life support issues. Putting
an entire enclosed life-support system on a blimp would be infeasible. I
think you would need something as large as the Hindenburg or bigger. Even
then, the Hindenburg was mostly empty space. By the time you've got all
the equipment you want to take to Jupiter onboard, you are looking at a
LOT of tonnage to support.
--
Stirling Westrup | Use of the Internet by this poster
sti@cam.org | is not to be construed as a tacit
| endorsement of Western Technological
| Civilization or its appurtenances.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:28:03 MST