Re: Technological Reform and Liberty (Re: Surveilance was: Transhuman fascists?)

From: Spike Jones (spike66@ibm.net)
Date: Sun Apr 02 2000 - 15:43:47 MDT

Next message: Michael S. Lorrey: "Re: Sticks and Stones (Was Re: Event on April 1)"
Previous message: Max More: "Re: ANTI-TECH: Electrohippies cyberattacks on GM companies"
In reply to: Ross A. Finlayson: "Technological Reform and Liberty (Re: Surveilance was: Transhuman fascists?)"
Next in thread: Michael S. Lorrey: "Re: Technological Reform and Liberty (Re: Surveilance was: Transhuman fascists?)"
Reply: Michael S. Lorrey: "Re: Technological Reform and Liberty (Re: Surveilance was: Transhuman fascists?)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Ross A. Finlayson wrote:

> I would say it would be a good idea for those that carry guns for government
> carry recording devices that were both required to be on when on duty,

It would be easy with current technology to make gun-cams for all the
cops, that starts recording the second the weapon is withdrawn from
the holster. Would *anyone* object to such a thing? spike

Next message: Michael S. Lorrey: "Re: Sticks and Stones (Was Re: Event on April 1)"
Previous message: Max More: "Re: ANTI-TECH: Electrohippies cyberattacks on GM companies"
In reply to: Ross A. Finlayson: "Technological Reform and Liberty (Re: Surveilance was: Transhuman fascists?)"
Next in thread: Michael S. Lorrey: "Re: Technological Reform and Liberty (Re: Surveilance was: Transhuman fascists?)"
Reply: Michael S. Lorrey: "Re: Technological Reform and Liberty (Re: Surveilance was: Transhuman fascists?)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:27:49 MST