From: Replicant00@aol.com
Date: Mon Mar 27 2000 - 08:24:05 MST
JG:
> >It offends me to think that the people alive today are somehow more
> valuable
> >and important then people from the past.
e_shaun:
>
> It is for this reason, and many others, that I'm shooting for the real
> immortality --why would I want to be an important part of the past when I
> could be an eternally kinetic part of the future?
>
The clause "more important" requires a lot of contextual information doesn't
it?
Importance must exist within context, to determine it's meaning. Motive,
benefit, usefulness, predilection, affection, and goal among other things,
affect it's meaning.
If my motive was to call someone and collaborate with them on a project, it's
be important that they be alive. 'Kinetic' as e_shaun so poetically puts it ;
).
If my main goal was that I could learn from them, that they be brilliant,
share my ideas and wouldn't argue or talk back to me ...
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:27:41 MST