Re: failure of debate

From: J. R. Molloy (jr@shasta.com)
Date: Sun Mar 05 2000 - 21:43:42 MST


Technotranscendence wrote,
>In fact,
>existence is literally everything that exists, which would include
>everything, including stuff we don't know about.

That seems like an entirely adequate definition of existence to me. OK, perhaps
you could add "everything and every non-thing" just to make it more perfectly
circular, all-inclusive, and accurate. Amazingly, someone will probably object
to this.

Cheers,

--J. R.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:27:11 MST