clones might not age faster after all

From: Damien Broderick (d.broderick@english.unimelb.edu.au)
Date: Sat Feb 12 2000 - 19:16:22 MST

• Next message: Doug Jones: "Re: Y2K preparations/was Re: hello again..."
• Previous message: Damien Broderick: "Re: Singularity information [was: Paths to the Singularity]"
• Next in thread: Ramez Naam: "RE: clones might not age faster after all"
• Maybe reply: Ramez Naam: "RE: clones might not age faster after all"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

http://www.newscientist.com/nsplus/insight/clone/clonesmaynot.html

• Next message: Doug Jones: "Re: Y2K preparations/was Re: hello again..."
• Previous message: Damien Broderick: "Re: Singularity information [was: Paths to the Singularity]"
• Next in thread: Ramez Naam: "RE: clones might not age faster after all"
• Maybe reply: Ramez Naam: "RE: clones might not age faster after all"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:26:46 MST