Re: Lamest Definition of Nano - Ever!

From: Edd111@aol.com
Date: Sat Jan 22 2000 - 13:35:55 MST

• Next message: James Wetterau: "Re: decriminalizing drugs..."
• Previous message: hal@finney.org: "Re: StockGeneration (was Re: [scam] $ pyramid scheme)"
• Maybe in reply to: Terry Donaghe: "Lamest Definition of Nano - Ever!"
• Next in thread: Gina Miller: "Re: Lamest Definition of Nano - Ever!"
• Reply: Gina Miller: "Re: Lamest Definition of Nano - Ever!"
• Reply: Robert Bradbury: "Re: Lamest Definition of Nano - Ever!"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Point of reference: How many atoms wide is the head of a pin?

• Next message: James Wetterau: "Re: decriminalizing drugs..."
• Previous message: hal@finney.org: "Re: StockGeneration (was Re: [scam] $ pyramid scheme)"
• Maybe in reply to: Terry Donaghe: "Lamest Definition of Nano - Ever!"
• Next in thread: Gina Miller: "Re: Lamest Definition of Nano - Ever!"
• Reply: Gina Miller: "Re: Lamest Definition of Nano - Ever!"
• Reply: Robert Bradbury: "Re: Lamest Definition of Nano - Ever!"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:26:23 MST