Re: rights for late-term and yet unborn human beings...

From: Damien Broderick (d.broderick@english.unimelb.edu.au)
Date: Sat Jan 22 2000 - 06:38:48 MST

Next message: Damien Broderick: "Re: SOC: The Monkey God (Was: Cannot prove nor disprove a soul.)"
Previous message: Damien Broderick: "Re: artificial wombs and the aftermath..."
In reply to: Robert Bradbury: "Re: rights for late-term and yet unborn human beings..."
Next in thread: Brian Manning Delaney: "Re: rights for late-term and yet unborn human beings..."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

At 11:51 AM 22/01/00 -0500, Robert B. wrote:

>> Isn't a late-term fetus (last trimester) to be honest a... baby?

>Its a semenatic issue.

Now, now, don't be androcentric, it's also an ova-atic issue.

>[Please don't flame me for the above,

Nah, never would. Well, hardly ever.

Damien [my lexical unit seems to be short-circuiting tonight]

Next message: Damien Broderick: "Re: SOC: The Monkey God (Was: Cannot prove nor disprove a soul.)"
Previous message: Damien Broderick: "Re: artificial wombs and the aftermath..."
In reply to: Robert Bradbury: "Re: rights for late-term and yet unborn human beings..."
Next in thread: Brian Manning Delaney: "Re: rights for late-term and yet unborn human beings..."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:26:22 MST