From: michael.bast@convergys.com
Date: Fri Jan 21 2000 - 10:46:45 MST
This is true, but largely (and I know this from growing up in a
neighborhood where probably 90% of the girls were pregnant by 16) it has to
do with not using birth control in the first place. Granted they're
children, so they don't think ahead, but I think my point still holds.
From: Amara Graps <amara@amara.com>
From: michael.bast@convergys.com Tue, 18 Jan 2000 09:44:53,
Re: atheist and anti-abortionist points-of-view:
> Given the ease of access to birth control, I don't think the 'woman's
>body' argument holds, since conception can be prevented why should a child
>suffer? Hope that answers the question.
The best birth control methods are not 100% reliable. Accidents happen.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:26:21 MST