Re: PHIL: Justificationalism (Was: Dynamic Optimism as a tool inlogical reas...

From: Enigl@aol.com
Date: Sun Jan 16 2000 - 18:53:37 MST


In a message dated 1/16/2000 5:18:09 PM Pacific Standard Time,
neptune@mars.superlink.net writes:

> A whole bunch of guys who take Hume's view on induction

You mean you don't?? Why not?
You certainly are not a mainstreamer in philosophy of science. I do not know
any scienctists who do not think that. Can you think of one? That
certainly is a new view. I have not heard that before. So, induction is no
problem?

Please state or rephrase this book reference so we can criticize your
interpretation and his conjectures <<H. W. B. Joseph's explanation of
induction in his _Introduction to Logic_ for a better solution to the
problem>>. Maybe this group (and I) will learn something.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:26:17 MST