From: Amara Graps (amara@amara.com)
Date: Sat Jan 15 2000 - 13:03:32 MST
From: Spike Jones <spike66@ibm.net> Fri, 14 Jan 2000 22:24:52
>If I understand it correctly, the larger a black hole, the harder it is to
>observe. Since the radiation it emits is a direct function of the surface
>area of the event horizon but the frequency is inversely proportional
>to the square of the area, a large black hole would emit less total
>radiation than a small one. If so, then the ones observed and reported
>in today's paper are the smaller ones? Its been several years since I
>have read Hawkings books. Perhaps Amara Graps can help us?
------------------------------------------------
(315) VII
Space being(don't forget to remember)Curved
(and that reminds me who said o yes Frost
Something there is which isn't fond of walls)
an electromagnetic(now I've lost
the)Einstein expanded Newton's law preserved
conTinuum(but we read that beFore)
of Course life being just a Reflex you
know since Everything is Relative or
to sum it All Up god being Dead(not to
mention inTerred)
LONG LIVE that Upwardlooking
Serene Illustrious and Beatific
Lord of Creation,MAN:
at a least crooking
of Whose compassionate digit,earth's most terrific
quadruped swoons into billiardBalls!
(ee cummings)
------------------------------------------------
..hows that for a nonscientific answer ..?
:-)
Amara
********************************************************************
Amara Graps email: amara@amara.com
Computational Physics vita: finger agraps@shell5.ba.best.com
Multiplex Answers URL: http://www.amara.com/
********************************************************************
"If you gaze for long into the abyss, the abyss also gazes into
you." - -Nietzsche
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:26:15 MST