10:13 -!- notcraigwright [~iamnotcra@104.231.205.87] has joined #bitcoin-dev 10:13 < notcraigwright> Sorry about all that, I didn’t think the message would actually go through. 10:15 < notcraigwright> Had I realized there was no SPF check or anything, I would have at least tried a little harder. 10:16 < notcraigwright> 297057d1024b8631e5d4961b7c9ebfa871b63c39f8d102adc88e955da4499311 10:18 -!- notcraigwright [~iamnotcra@104.231.205.87] has left #bitcoin-dev [] 10:37 < kanzure> is that a valid signature for anything? ~iamnotcra@cpe-104-231-205-87.wi.res.rr.com (freenode) 10:46 -!- Irssi: Starting query in freenode with notcraigwright 10:46 Not exactly, just something i can use to prove myself if necessary once i get off this IP. 10:47 prove what? 10:48 that i am the same person who had this IP at this time 10:50 should have put it in the email, that would have made things much more exciting 10:50 generally contributions are accepted regardless of identity, not sure why you care 10:57 i’ll try to make future contributions more positive 10:59 satoshi speculation emails should ideally be sent to the bitcoin-discuss mailing list instead (hosted on the server) 11:01 I was exploring how trustworthy the Aug 15 Satoshi email could be considered. Not very. 11:03 not quite true, 11:03 https://www.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/3w5e7k/interesting_change_in_devs_detective_attitude/cxtob1h 11:04 https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2015-August/010329.html 11:07 I have some reason to believe that it would not be impossible to have relayed through vistomail last night.