Viruses in a vector
Adrian.Philbey at SMTPGWY.AGRIC.NSW.GOV.AU
Adrian.Philbey at SMTPGWY.AGRIC.NSW.GOV.AU
Wed May 22 00:02:13 EST 1996
Ursula Keuper-Bennett (howzit at io.org) some time ago asked
about detection of a suspected oncogenic virus of turtles in
a putative piscine vector:
>I believe that a disease is possibly being transmitted by a
>vector. The vector is a fish. (Actually several species of
>fish have been observed performing "cleaning" behaviour)
>I figure tissue, material and the viruses gets carried
>around by the fish
>My question is this.
>If I captured one or several of these suspected mechanical
>vectors, would a lab be able to detect the viruses after
>(say) 24 hours or more has passed. (Could be in the
>dentition for example)
If you knew what virus you were looking for, it should be
feasible to prepare samples from the fish that would allow
you to detect the virus if viral material was present in
sufficient quantity. For example, viral sequences might be
detectable by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) or viral
particles might be detectable by electron microscopy in fish
stored at 4oC for short periods in suitable transport
medium, frozen at -20oC or -80oC or preserved in formalin,
depending on the particular virus and its properties of
environmental resilience. My opinion is that it is unlikely
that a virus would be detected in a fish acting as a
mechanical vector, because only a low proportion of fish
would be carrying the virus at any sampling point and the
quantity of virus carried by the vector would probably be
very low. Even if you did detect virus in the fish, you
could not be certain that the fish was acting as a
mechanical vector, because it might be an inconsequential
side-effect of the close contact between the fish and the
turtles while feeding/cleaning around the turtles' eyes.
If I am right in assuming that so far you have not
identified the suspected virus causing the eye tumours in
the turtles, I think it would be more productive to search
for evidence of viral infection by examining tumour material
directly. Electron microscopy would be a starting point.
Attempts to isolate the virus in cell culture could also be
done. Molecular techniques that could be used to identify
sequences of viruses in neoplasms include PCR using primers
specific for known oncogenic viruses or degenerate or
consensus primers designed to amplify conserved sequences
from known oncogenic virus groups, as well as
representational difference analysis, differential display,
arbitrarily primed PCR and subtractive hybridisation. A lot
of effort is required to identify oncogenic viruses.
Are the tumours transmissible? To determine this, it would
be necessary to maintain a sufficient number of turtles
under controlled conditions. The number of tumours that
develop in unaffected turtles exposed to affected turtles
would be compared to the number of tumours that develop in
turtles in isolation. The presence or absence of the
putative piscine vector could also be included in the
experiment to incriminate the fish you suspect is acting as
a vector. An experiment of this scale with turtles would be
difficult to set up.
>I know from my readings that viruses can't survive on their
>own for any length of time. Hmmmm. .. I guess I have
>another question.
>Can dead viruses be detected in such a scenario?
PCR can be sometimes be used to detect nucleic acids in
othrwise degraded material. The specific sequences of the
virus must be known, however.
Adrian W Philbey
Veterinary Research Officer
Elizabeth Macarthur Agricultural Institute
Private Mail Bag 8
Camden NSW 2570
Australia
Telephone: 61-46-293332
Facsimile: 61-46-293429
email: philbea at agric.nsw.gov.au
More information about the Virology
mailing list