Ebola virus outbreak in Africa
Soderlund J Marcus
4jms2 at qlink.queensu.ca
Mon May 15 17:54:53 EST 1995
Kevin P. Schifferli (kevins at planetcom.com) wrote:
: Actually I think the most dangerous disease known to man is Lassa
: Fever
IMHO pondering what virus is "most dangerous" or whatever doesn't really
make any sense unless you're into BCW, in which case the most dangerous
virus is the one that you or your colleagues are trying to develop. A
gentically engineered endotoxic reverse transcriptose DNA virus would be
my current "favorite" for an Andromeda virus. The technology in biotech
will very likely make your worst nightmares possible in just a few years
from now if it indeed has not yet been perfected. But as of now, BW bugs
aside, I'd say that we haven't yet hit (or found) the Big One. As to the
known viruses, what constitutes "most dangerous" can be defined in many
different ways. Is the one that is most contageous, most common, the one
with highest mortality when left untreated, one with no vaccines or
cures, one with high mutagenity, one that kills quickest, or some other
designation? In the USA, AIDS probably kills the most people (just a
guess; I don't have statistics although very recent ones are available
through CDC or WHO) and is 100% fatal, but not very contagious except
through "certain kinds of activities" as one health expert so aptly put it.
Lassa is not quite as fatal as Ebola (especially Ebola Zaire ['76] -- the
current strain or one very similiar to it), with "only" ~50% mortality,
and to the best of my knowledge is not found on US soil except in "hot
suites" (IV labs). You should be more concerned with Hantaan, especially
the Baltimore strain.
Summa summarum, IMHO the "most dangerous disease" to man is one that we
ourselves will develop or dig out from the bush. Just an opinion.
Marcus.
More information about the Virology
mailing list