Received: from sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.194] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1Z4fYO-0006uH-3Z for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 16 Jun 2015 01:20:40 +0000 Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com designates 209.85.220.48 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.220.48; envelope-from=elombrozo@gmail.com; helo=mail-pa0-f48.google.com; Received: from mail-pa0-f48.google.com ([209.85.220.48]) by sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) id 1Z4fYM-0001rE-RJ for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 16 Jun 2015 01:20:40 +0000 Received: by pabqy3 with SMTP id qy3so1895201pab.3 for ; Mon, 15 Jun 2015 18:20:33 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.70.33.102 with SMTP id q6mr52572759pdi.37.1434417633181; Mon, 15 Jun 2015 18:20:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.102] (cpe-76-167-237-202.san.res.rr.com. [76.167.237.202]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id j9sm12910084pbq.92.2015.06.15.18.20.30 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 15 Jun 2015 18:20:31 -0700 (PDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2098\)) Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_BAACD978-19FA-4C1C-A031-79A489DB0DBB"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512 X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 2.5b6 From: Eric Lombrozo In-Reply-To: <557F57B7.4050809@riseup.net> Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2015 18:20:28 -0700 Message-Id: References: <557F57B7.4050809@riseup.net> To: odinn X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2098) X-Spam-Score: -0.6 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for sender-domain 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (elombrozo[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 1.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature X-Headers-End: 1Z4fYM-0001rE-RJ Cc: Bitcoin Dev Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] questions about bitcoin-XT code fork & non-consensus hard-fork X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2015 01:20:40 -0000 --Apple-Mail=_BAACD978-19FA-4C1C-A031-79A489DB0DBB Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_A7FE93E1-A9CB-4BA7-B1FB-ABC8C65A8D76" --Apple-Mail=_A7FE93E1-A9CB-4BA7-B1FB-ABC8C65A8D76 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > On Jun 15, 2015, at 3:54 PM, odinn = wrote: >=20 > I also disagree with the notion that everybody's just ok with what > Mike and Gavin are doing.... specifically, this statement by Mike >=20 > > The consensus you seek does exist. All wallet developers (except > > Lawrence), all the major exchanges, all the major payment > > processors and many of the major mining pools want to see the limit > > lifted This is certainly twisting words! We all agree that the limit needs to eventually be lifted - but some of = us certainly disagree with the means being used to do so by Mike and = Gavin. Most news publications keep the discussion rather shallow and like to = keep the controversy pretty black and white - some of us have far more = nuanced views! - Eric Lombrozo --Apple-Mail=_A7FE93E1-A9CB-4BA7-B1FB-ABC8C65A8D76 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
On Jun 15, 2015, at 3:54 PM, odinn <odinn.cyberguerrilla@riseup.net> wrote:

I also disagree with the notion that everybody's = just ok with what
Mike and Gavin are = doing.... specifically, this statement by Mike

> The consensus you seek does exist. All = wallet developers (except
> Lawrence), all the = major exchanges, all the major payment
> processors and many of the major mining = pools want to see the limit
> = lifted


This is certainly twisting = words!

We all = agree that the limit needs to eventually be lifted - but some of us = certainly disagree with the means being used to do so by Mike and = Gavin.

Most = news publications keep the discussion rather shallow and like to keep = the controversy pretty black and white - some of us have far more = nuanced views!

-= Eric Lombrozo
= --Apple-Mail=_A7FE93E1-A9CB-4BA7-B1FB-ABC8C65A8D76-- --Apple-Mail=_BAACD978-19FA-4C1C-A031-79A489DB0DBB Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJVf3ncAAoJEJNAI64YFENUMO4QAK3V1d3Bf5w49e+bdWjMly1S siXtr4AFeX69IJsd1FmInaW7zDUdPmhOemtC4mTbR1qc9AbEnQyIin/Fc7JbMv+Q efgc9gbIYDYr9Kbik3CpJaKTinY7mTcui9J02vgD39E/duOQ8GIyfbUgE/V1lbFS cBKeY186C9rUY1+kuwgmwlN0BCRDcpGyL+VrjIffCS5Y3Vkg/SdLVb9WyXlN6G15 OhKp+ejX5hKyC9MgsSj0SI4MT2WYbnSNiu8DZYy3/o+npJ2PexnOaYEYXEh4hMbR WWvEkUWnGmXQLcENfKYmilRmz60lOsqKb9QYBiFffgYiyMCrMSv4TbaupKCeDvCA tmJnUvprB2O/ZELILFyWOytNDS06u9W/BQbEnUAiVDHzKvxpPVml+McHCFTx8V0K ilqhefyjla7BfIf/nryj7qYDQFW7epRoijWoW0QjY/9MZ8xxJ60j16IyVL52FzTc B6EC1p7K4bkcirbf3ppxUQcAuT8K0y7VpJcFdZACYGgswqivlLA7TI8uwBt6BmoX XLYZOYox+e8wIRdTmrszltbr2dwp/fk/sZM5XqVkcaQ6j9ZQQ+2K8ofPkBandsyr 1mIGVT20bFrflMfgxpIaq5xnTz4YRH/1B7+VafCmI31fVbJZ+fvgDP3rL1u6Mule OhH2jBugDRfF8e4J4JN1 =frto -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail=_BAACD978-19FA-4C1C-A031-79A489DB0DBB--