Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 36235DB5 for ; Mon, 12 Feb 2018 18:12:42 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from outmail149056.authsmtp.com (outmail149056.authsmtp.com [62.13.149.56]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 261BC401 for ; Mon, 12 Feb 2018 18:12:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-c247.authsmtp.com (mail-c247.authsmtp.com [62.13.128.247]) by punt24.authsmtp.com. (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id w1CICbt6004105; Mon, 12 Feb 2018 18:12:37 GMT (envelope-from pete@petertodd.org) Received: from petertodd.org (ec2-52-5-185-120.compute-1.amazonaws.com [52.5.185.120]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.authsmtp.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id w1CICZYB003840 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 12 Feb 2018 18:12:36 GMT (envelope-from pete@petertodd.org) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by petertodd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EB5F7400D0; Mon, 12 Feb 2018 18:12:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: by localhost (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 1EF7420630; Mon, 12 Feb 2018 13:12:32 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2018 13:12:32 -0500 From: Peter Todd To: Melvin Carvalho , Bitcoin Protocol Discussion Message-ID: <20180212181232.GA6489@fedora-23-dvm> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="mYCpIKhGyMATD0i+" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-Server-Quench: 4de0a3c8-1020-11e8-8106-0015176ca198 X-AuthReport-Spam: If SPAM / abuse - report it at: http://www.authsmtp.com/abuse X-AuthRoute: OCd2Yg0TA1ZNQRgX IjsJECJaVQIpKltL GxAVKBZePFsRUQkR aAdMdwAUHlAWAgsB Am4bWlxeUV97WmU7 bghPaBtcak9QXgdq T0pMXVMcUwQbeG9r b2weUhp6cwUIfHh4 bQhmCiVbDUcpfVt8 QkxUCGwHMG99YGEf Vl1YdwJRcQRMLU5E Y1gxNiYHcQ5VPz4z GA41ejw8IwAXFCNJ SwVFI18fWg4LFyAx DxkGGDI0AQUOXSIo NBEqYkIcEQ4bNkI5 MhM7VE0RKRN6 X-Authentic-SMTP: 61633532353630.1038:706 X-AuthFastPath: 0 (Was 255) X-AuthSMTP-Origin: 52.5.185.120/25 X-AuthVirus-Status: No virus detected - but ensure you scan with your own anti-virus system. X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Total fees have almost crossed the block reward X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2018 18:12:42 -0000 --mYCpIKhGyMATD0i+ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 06:23:35PM +0100, Melvin Carvalho via bitcoin-dev w= rote: > Finally, I came across this wonderful site that shows lightning network > adoption on mainnet >=20 > http://shabang.io/ >=20 > LN is increasing well. Some blocks are not far off 1% lightning funding, > which I think bodes well. I'll go out on a limb and predict that over 1% > of btc tx will be lightning based by year end. Does shabang.io say anywhere how it determines whether or not a transaction funded a Lightning channel? --=20 https://petertodd.org 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org --mYCpIKhGyMATD0i+ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEFcyURjhyM68BBPYTJIFAPaXwkfsFAlqB2QwACgkQJIFAPaXw kfuTYQf+Lz4hi6i2sUjXn3kb5evqAzFBKPEoGCT0j3dtBDF3tEniD07lFNxfLYwI S1CbrIRY1fMj2xUtVqXHYdDNogJ5fZejb0vnonWWcA0AkY2v+HGYQ/Lir/E64YqK 2L5T6lGEFJPeBtLflOhszD4W5kiu1U7kkmxIbuoO30bXZGnnRPynBjDRDehyYHYf HxD8Yl8f3pGIQup8iJKOF7BxO4p3cPmzN2vo6fCMpiaIuc+N+4RM7EF1gR7NILrp tsFtVpmLFu+wMo+XDDvsa7clknK7fDO+USPxFyvy12e51JrMnZyMgI8czFug5XaB VdYEMhKpIbxZm/tw4xTqFmxcyw0MSw== =97Zk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --mYCpIKhGyMATD0i+--