Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-2.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1We2hn-0007LS-D9 for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Sat, 26 Apr 2014 13:31:47 +0000 X-ACL-Warn: Received: from mail-oa0-f42.google.com ([209.85.219.42]) by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) id 1We2hl-0007oj-CA for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Sat, 26 Apr 2014 13:31:47 +0000 Received: by mail-oa0-f42.google.com with SMTP id i4so5468633oah.29 for ; Sat, 26 Apr 2014 06:31:39 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=xE7B3War3LTD591s4uJOf3OmFrD241p5Uzp1QSz9/rM=; b=T/1hmDWZAxkcexbdpnQoZZFAMm8eI7O5yBqg/KjOUHQc/aZtu8QGCBnIa4YImlK0Ld uyK6ZaifnL3kduUipDyZN0g5t08rGAZxWaGvjU1T+jNEE9OWeTW04FVIDrrjVB1FX4nC BbgE0QqC9KFAlvzLxkshJ0wSe39BwA+iLjjJPcA2MXI5UYK+Q5ua2tns+W8R034lvsi8 0Bnntq8lv9f37PN4KHG3qLhb25ybx4XPJvbxpyc1GQR1M+mlCjnpRZHeyDqVzSPO8KBy fhxwJlwlV+msfNILvytmoNm+OGnNote5wEAp72oxcelfqpA6CizECXKiqk6umtbJdhpB Gc5Q== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnQJge4vy4GmT5DnriSYk0AiO4cpeTB4dmhZHX7UOOytdTFwwmGuNha/MXswf3SJSxI4jVP X-Received: by 10.182.248.131 with SMTP id ym3mr1541340obc.58.1398515098991; Sat, 26 Apr 2014 05:24:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tetra.site ([91.239.236.56]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id h1sm22350956obr.15.2014.04.26.05.24.57 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 26 Apr 2014 05:24:58 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <535BA597.70708@gk2.sk> Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2014 14:24:55 +0200 From: Pavol Rusnak User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bitcoin Dev References: <1398437607.23028.110362141.03111A2A@webmail.messagingengine.com> <535B8C43.8030502@gmx.de> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. X-Headers-End: 1We2hl-0007oj-CA Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] BIP32 "wallet structure" in use? Remove it? X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2014 13:31:47 -0000 On 04/26/2014 12:48 PM, Tier Nolan wrote: > Maybe the solution is to have a defined way to import an unknown wallet? That is nonsense. There is no way how to import the wallet if you don't know its structure. > Given a blockchain and a root seed, it should be possible to find all the > addresses for that root seed. Unless the keyspace is almost infinite because: > The hierarchy that the wallet actually uses could be anything. -- Best Regards / S pozdravom, Pavol Rusnak