Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2011 10:49:39 +0200
From: Pieter Wuille <pieter.wuille@gmail.com>
To: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Message-ID: <20110707084937.GA10392@ulyssis.org>
References: <CAJNQ0stvozeQAVFkduY7Ph5EXy8ayYwiu4T+6Oz1RwjgiDnBeA@mail.gmail.com>
	<20110703104415.GA2034@ulyssis.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20110703104415.GA2034@ulyssis.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Reconsider build system change?
Precedence: list

On Sun, Jul 03, 2011 at 12:44:17PM +0200, Pieter Wuille wrote:
> I have no preference for any particular project build system. If a system
> * is easy enough to set up (included in standard repositories, eg.)
> * allows building of the bitcoin codebase on several linux distro's
> * does cross-compilation to windows
> * supports osx
> * is easy to maintain
> * it is not too hard to adapt other GUI's to use it (bitcoin-qt,
>   maybe others as well, i hear about a cocoabitcoin?)
> * gets implemented and tested to support all of the above
> .. i have no problem with choosing that system for future versions.

Other opinions? Someone actually interested in writing a cmake configuration
for bitcoin?

-- 
Pieter