Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 955ABC7E for ; Mon, 29 Feb 2016 11:52:40 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-vk0-f49.google.com (mail-vk0-f49.google.com [209.85.213.49]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2D35E149 for ; Mon, 29 Feb 2016 11:52:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-vk0-f49.google.com with SMTP id e6so130771605vkh.2 for ; Mon, 29 Feb 2016 03:52:40 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:cc; bh=VMtOw3e9ZGuGdogt7XasTOZ8qHDutUBbXWJ8hHMNO88=; b=F72BsG2baeuF57V3+hojWYHFBsc9KP1cf2wLsVCG/Dn2lEAuuDU5KvI8q8K829bc39 Lj/Mu2xD1PzGTpaaSwjUoLsGTKJroO5qh3ha5UJWYYkYGCiUDA0HF1PDqGadzxp1p/tY 3eyNjRs2pBNRcm7gkf7p5cWC29k1fJhbFaLaz/VoxDohWLNL+eLhNcdPIz1cgfTVQaRx MlRfEQzWGFhRR3boIMVaVk5g0IGDX2+Ox7vJp2/3A9zNLB9AogL3XlbLzSJ7TzTR3zE4 o9CDtmnYQlLTpTAe/JcsZ9blWAjwMcAREeK+Onqk61CfDLHHRFG9gwIVKqLhSmPPACz/ XHnA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:cc; bh=VMtOw3e9ZGuGdogt7XasTOZ8qHDutUBbXWJ8hHMNO88=; b=bxyBjxnE3r/f0zlBYVsIavV8ec1jh1PoMuDEbKglnmaCoQ4lndJhkNPKq7PJkDehvD rvU+U7VP72XJD671RYN1/yySJyiq5K/oGZQ1fXcdBm1Ky0rkMFxwLJ7JMNAl2LQzsigE MEH9RY9GxULAmCb6cRp9N3T9uu+faI+FZHLRP6c5wZwTJEO8UxmFeM10/Rg9tR1WNgob vhmfGHVajDkGnuT7gI3cvWEp97h7fTeRWHyvIFoGruINJuAuUJCX9VjUII66XuOdJqeG FXFhiSRtuc6b3PlqOrnoHrZECPvfqrCYbX6E1kUkCxjGyhF7HhyEwtILlWVMY+OKO93m uU5w== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJLR3yFf8Ne1QPDwU4R6smskaRZ4eE4TKOLbYHbVDN0MXKZNMJHYMCme5m9dxmKEAV2+3iUjB5vwM+5hNA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.31.161.195 with SMTP id k186mr9336256vke.129.1456746759441; Mon, 29 Feb 2016 03:52:39 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.159.37.137 with HTTP; Mon, 29 Feb 2016 03:52:39 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <23e401d16552$996546d0$cc2fd470$@xbt.hk> Date: Mon, 29 Feb 2016 11:52:39 +0000 Message-ID: From: Tier Nolan Cc: Bitcoin Dev Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1143f36c1fe3bc052ce7491d X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,MISSING_HEADERS, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=no version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP CPRKV: Check private key verify X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Feb 2016 11:52:40 -0000 --001a1143f36c1fe3bc052ce7491d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 10:58 AM, Mats Jerratsch wrote: > This is actually very useful for LN too, see relevant discussion here > > > http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2015-November/011827.html > Is there much demand for trying to code up a patch to the reference client? I did a basic one, but it would need tests etc. added. I think that segregated witness is going to be using up any potential soft-fork slot for the time being anyway. --001a1143f36c1fe3bc052ce7491d Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On M= on, Feb 29, 2016 at 10:58 AM, Mats Jerratsch <matsjj@gmail.com> wrote:
This is actually very useful f= or LN too, see relevant discussion here

http://lists.linuxfo= undation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2015-November/011827.html

Is there much demand for trying to code up a patc= h to the reference client?=C2=A0 I did a basic one, but it would need tests= etc. added.

I think that segregated witness is going to = be using up any potential soft-fork slot for the time being anyway.
--001a1143f36c1fe3bc052ce7491d--