Return-Path: <naama.kates@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
	[172.17.192.35])
	by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C200D22DB
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Tue,  6 Oct 2015 19:40:27 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-pa0-f46.google.com (mail-pa0-f46.google.com
	[209.85.220.46])
	by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 02CC91B9
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Tue,  6 Oct 2015 19:40:26 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by pacfv12 with SMTP id fv12so223336677pac.2
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Tue, 06 Oct 2015 12:40:26 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc
	:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to;
	bh=jX6yigcpHhk0MMTDdPrwpaXB4iVPDo3+piWptXEQW0E=;
	b=jREON1zLD0Dmue7tOzfAwqwkA6Mn8L9BKt7ywSBPa1hregket8lyoCXxOFfkDdDswI
	/axobI02cizdMjOYBZpID5clbX5tDh08oO1f9tyG1G+jHKxKER/GTHB2r0MQ2NYvBvox
	8m/C3gc6/Jf0F8W1GAPe7Cteyz3WlmuUo619dRTsgO6Pek5vCErLemSJ0RRr/1TMjRF1
	Hl07JIv30ATUghLI94khdTiJDnrPojOpueG08AQ0P9oGwveNnpSD5byO0CLMY8zVsysl
	rlh6HS8qhIsbOq2h3txIny7FjYEGX9rhgYl04PM2EgUIUncHwcoIqebqGkG/veG9qrx2
	402g==
X-Received: by 10.67.12.166 with SMTP id er6mr48439962pad.40.1444160426550;
	Tue, 06 Oct 2015 12:40:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.2.6] (cpe-76-91-152-174.socal.res.rr.com.
	[76.91.152.174]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id
	mk5sm35271229pab.44.2015.10.06.12.40.25
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
	Tue, 06 Oct 2015 12:40:25 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary=Apple-Mail-6EDAE9CD-6FBA-40A8-9C64-4DDBC29580BB
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
From: naama.kates@gmail.com
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (12A405)
In-Reply-To: <CAKfs=Z-P+ni1nYOqZvP7HGzp3ERa_hHk=VQQzo0o+8_n6FHf0w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2015 12:40:25 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <B03B9E2B-3B07-4C1B-9AF1-9BAB78B21770@gmail.com>
References: <trinity-4a10aebe-091a-4dac-bdac-36384ef9df63-1444115834646@3capp-mailcom-bs03>
	<em15654dcc-2b93-4166-9464-bd2b7f322616@platinum>
	<CAAUq484f_fb2WJY7YvW+urV_pPw3FKA6OhXUBDDHUfqp6bcSWQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAKfs=Z-P+ni1nYOqZvP7HGzp3ERa_hHk=VQQzo0o+8_n6FHf0w@mail.gmail.com>
To: NotMike Hearn <not.mike.hearn@gmail.com>
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, HTML_MESSAGE,
	MIME_QP_LONG_LINE, 
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
	smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Cc: bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] This thread is not about the soft/hard fork
	technical debate
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2015 19:40:27 -0000


--Apple-Mail-6EDAE9CD-6FBA-40A8-9C64-4DDBC29580BB
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Just read the proposal for the dual modes... Think it would be best... Proto=
col question?  Do we discuss the algorithms here on this forum?  Or...

Sorry again for my thick skull!

Nina K

Sent from my iPhone

> On Oct 6, 2015, at 1:34 AM, NotMike Hearn via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev@lis=
ts.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>=20
> I think I can solve the debate and give everyone what they want.
>=20
> Some people want BIP65, others do not.
>=20
> We can roll out 65 in a clever way, such that Greg/PeterT can get it, but M=
ike and Peter R don't need to have it (both versions can run alongside each o=
ther). Even better, people can switch back and forth between versions as muc=
h as they like.
>=20
> How might this work? Well, paradoxically, we could do this by *imposing ad=
ditional constraints* on transaction validation, such that transactions made=
 a very specific certain way will always look valid to non-CLTVers, but for C=
LTVers they will not be valid unless the CLTV rules are followed. The obviou=
s concern is that non-CLTV people might receive invalid payments. However, t=
heir software is already set up to request payments in a non-CLTV way, so, l=
uckily, this is actually not a problem at all! SPV clients can elect to only=
 connect to nodes which are non-CLTV.
>=20
> Problem solved!
>=20
> I am happy to have solved this problem for you all, and ended this discord=
 harmoniously. If we all put our heads together, these words of founding fat=
her Aretha Franklin will ring true: "there's nothing we can't overcome".
>=20
>=20
>> On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 3:29 AM, Marcel Jamin via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev=
@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>> This is childish and very disappointing to see.
>>=20
>> 2015-10-06 9:20 GMT+02:00 Eric Lombrozo via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev@list=
s.linuxfoundation.org>:
>>> I prefer the term "clown".
>>>=20
>>> Can we please move on?
>>>=20
>>> ------ Original Message ------
>>> From: "cipher anthem via bitcoin-dev" <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation=
.org>
>>> To: milly@bitcoins.info
>>> Cc: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
>>> Sent: 10/6/2015 12:17:14 AM
>>> Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] This thread is not about the soft/hard fork t=
echnical debate
>>>=20
>>>>>  Sent: Monday, October 05, 2015 at 8:21 PM
>>>>>  From: "Milly Bitcoin via bitcoin-dev" <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundat=
ion.org>
>>>>>  To: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
>>>>>  Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] This thread is not about the soft/hard for=
k technical debate
>>>>>>  On 10/5/2015 4:05 PM, Steven Pine via bitcoin-dev wrote:
>>>>>>  It's pretty clear Mike has turned into concern troll and bully.
>>>>=20
>>>>>  "troll" and, even worse, "concern troll" are terms generally used by
>>>>>  teenagers on places like Reddit to complain about someone who doesn't=

>>>>>  agree with them.
>>>>=20
>>>> They should substitute troll for cultist so they appear more profession=
al...
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> bitcoin-dev mailing list
>>>> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
>>>> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>>>=20
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> bitcoin-dev mailing list
>>> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
>>> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>>=20
>>=20
>> _______________________________________________
>> bitcoin-dev mailing list
>> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
>> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>=20
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev

--Apple-Mail-6EDAE9CD-6FBA-40A8-9C64-4DDBC29580BB
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<html><head><meta http-equiv=3D"content-type" content=3D"text/html; charset=3D=
utf-8"></head><body dir=3D"auto"><div>Just read the proposal for the dual mo=
des... Think it would be best... Protocol question? &nbsp;Do we discuss the a=
lgorithms here on this forum? &nbsp;Or...</div><div><br></div><div>Sorry aga=
in for my thick skull!</div><div><br></div><div>Nina K</div><div><br>Sent fr=
om my iPhone</div><div><br>On Oct 6, 2015, at 1:34 AM, NotMike Hearn via bit=
coin-dev &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org">bitcoi=
n-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org</a>&gt; wrote:<br><br></div><blockquote type=
=3D"cite"><div><div dir=3D"ltr">I think I can solve the debate and give ever=
yone what they want.<br><br>Some people want BIP65, others do not.<br><br>We=
 can roll out 65 in a clever way, such that Greg/PeterT can get it, but Mike=
 and Peter R don't need to have it (both versions can run alongside each oth=
er). Even better, people can switch back and forth between versions as much a=
s they like.<br><br>How might this work? Well, paradoxically, we could do th=
is by *imposing additional constraints* on transaction validation, such that=
 transactions made a very specific certain way will always look valid to non=
-CLTVers, but for CLTVers they will not be valid unless the CLTV rules are f=
ollowed. The obvious concern is that non-CLTV people might receive invalid p=
ayments. However, their software is already set up to request payments in a n=
on-CLTV way, so, luckily, this is actually not a problem at all! SPV clients=
 can elect to only connect to nodes which are non-CLTV.<div><br></div><div>P=
roblem solved!<br><br>I am happy to have solved this problem for you all, an=
d ended this discord harmoniously. If we all put our heads together, these w=
ords of founding father Aretha Franklin will ring true: "there's nothing we c=
an't overcome".<br><br></div></div><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br><div class=
=3D"gmail_quote">On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 3:29 AM, Marcel Jamin via bitcoin-de=
v <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.=
org" target=3D"_blank">bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org</a>&gt;</span> w=
rote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border=
-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir=3D"ltr">This is childish and=
 very disappointing to see.</div><div class=3D"HOEnZb"><div class=3D"h5"><di=
v class=3D"gmail_extra"><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">2015-10-06 9:20 GMT+0=
2:00 Eric Lombrozo via bitcoin-dev <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:b=
itcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org" target=3D"_blank">bitcoin-dev@lists.li=
nuxfoundation.org</a>&gt;</span>:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=
=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">I prefer t=
he term "clown".<br>
<br>
Can we please move on?<br>
<br>
------ Original Message ------<br>
From: "cipher anthem via bitcoin-dev" &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@list=
s.linuxfoundation.org" target=3D"_blank">bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.o=
rg</a>&gt;<br>
To: <a href=3D"mailto:milly@bitcoins.info" target=3D"_blank">milly@bitcoins.=
info</a><br>
Cc: <a href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org" target=3D"_blan=
k">bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org</a><br>
Sent: 10/6/2015 12:17:14 AM<br>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] This thread is not about the soft/hard fork techn=
ical debate<br>
<br>
<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px=
 #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"mar=
gin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
&nbsp;Sent: Monday, October 05, 2015 at 8:21 PM<br>
&nbsp;From: "Milly Bitcoin via bitcoin-dev" &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-de=
v@lists.linuxfoundation.org" target=3D"_blank">bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfounda=
tion.org</a>&gt;<br>
&nbsp;To: <a href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org" target=3D=
"_blank">bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org</a><br>
&nbsp;Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] This thread is not about the soft/hard fork=
 technical debate<br>
&nbsp;On 10/5/2015 4:05 PM, Steven Pine via bitcoin-dev wrote:<br>
<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px=
 #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
&nbsp;It's pretty clear Mike has turned into concern troll and bully.<br>
</blockquote></blockquote>
<br>
<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px=
 #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
&nbsp;"troll" and, even worse, "concern troll" are terms generally used by<b=
r>
&nbsp;teenagers on places like Reddit to complain about someone who doesn't<=
br>
&nbsp;agree with them.<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
They should substitute troll for cultist so they appear more professional...=
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
bitcoin-dev mailing list<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org" target=3D"_blank">b=
itcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org</a><br>
<a href=3D"https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev" r=
el=3D"noreferrer" target=3D"_blank">https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailma=
n/listinfo/bitcoin-dev</a><br>
</blockquote>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
bitcoin-dev mailing list<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org" target=3D"_blank">b=
itcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org</a><br>
<a href=3D"https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev" r=
el=3D"noreferrer" target=3D"_blank">https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailma=
n/listinfo/bitcoin-dev</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br></div>
</div></div><br>_______________________________________________<br>
bitcoin-dev mailing list<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org">bitcoin-dev@lists.l=
inuxfoundation.org</a><br>
<a href=3D"https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev" r=
el=3D"noreferrer" target=3D"_blank">https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailma=
n/listinfo/bitcoin-dev</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>
</div></blockquote><blockquote type=3D"cite"><div><span>____________________=
___________________________</span><br><span>bitcoin-dev mailing list</span><=
br><span><a href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org">bitcoin-de=
v@lists.linuxfoundation.org</a></span><br><span><a href=3D"https://lists.lin=
uxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev">https://lists.linuxfoundation=
.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev</a></span><br></div></blockquote></body></=
html>=

--Apple-Mail-6EDAE9CD-6FBA-40A8-9C64-4DDBC29580BB--