Received: from sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.194] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1WjtU6-0005Pk-UI for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 12 May 2014 16:53:50 +0000 Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com designates 209.85.215.41 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.215.41; envelope-from=gmaxwell@gmail.com; helo=mail-la0-f41.google.com; Received: from mail-la0-f41.google.com ([209.85.215.41]) by sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) id 1WjtU6-0006Dc-5T for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 12 May 2014 16:53:50 +0000 Received: by mail-la0-f41.google.com with SMTP id e16so2139237lan.14 for ; Mon, 12 May 2014 09:53:43 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.165.40 with SMTP id yv8mr749130lbb.83.1399913622901; Mon, 12 May 2014 09:53:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.112.89.68 with HTTP; Mon, 12 May 2014 09:53:42 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 12 May 2014 09:53:42 -0700 Message-ID: From: Gregory Maxwell To: Bitcoin Development Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Spam-Score: -1.6 (-) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for sender-domain 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (gmaxwell[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature X-Headers-End: 1WjtU6-0006Dc-5T Subject: [Bitcoin-development] Prenumbered BIP naming X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 May 2014 16:53:51 -0000 I've noticed some folks struggling to attach labels to their yet to be numbered BIPs. I'd recommend people call them "draft-
-" like draft-maxwell-coinburning in the style of pre-WG IETF drafts.