Return-Path: Received: from fraxinus.osuosl.org (smtp4.osuosl.org [140.211.166.137]) by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9575C013A for ; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 17:42:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fraxinus.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C536286DE5 for ; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 17:42:26 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from fraxinus.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TbgOjHjbi0Rx for ; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 17:42:26 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail.ruggedbytes.com (mail.ruggedbytes.com [88.99.30.248]) by fraxinus.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49B7D867BD for ; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 17:42:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.ruggedbytes.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.ruggedbytes.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B6AB3260023D; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 17:42:24 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=simplexum.com; s=mail; t=1613151744; bh=5A8fVualvriV+4fH8xB1HlJPB4d36xDfxCwcZkkxS8g=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=coXEHsNfns/rPVSvhgsgurcHrWIt3YOkCiXNkxBX2ZrZgtlPBuSUHf+fGqWQIvThB A4Ha9irPqAijarlNBzcCPkrb06bA/RhLOjQZnKzCJibUtNYfBiUOobwsq06UvSK625 qGLI51+ELwwHzjsNDfph7swtHJ/85o2pbKkv3Ccg= Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2021 18:48:09 +0100 From: Dmitry Petukhov To: Hugo Nguyen Message-ID: <20210212184809.40208bfd@simplexum.com> In-Reply-To: <20210212184231.22b517aa@simplexum.com> References: <20210211172910.3b550706@simplexum.com> <20210212184231.22b517aa@simplexum.com> Organization: simplexum.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 12 Feb 2021 18:29:59 +0000 Cc: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Proposal: Bitcoin Secure Multisig Setup X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2021 17:42:26 -0000 =D0=92 Fri, 12 Feb 2021 18:42:31 +0100 Dmitry Petukhov wrote: > Maybe for the UX it would be better to choose the number of rounds to > use in PBKDF2, instead of using variable Pwd. Number of rounds will be > easier to enter on the device (or just choose it from a set of > pre-defined values). The more money is at stake, the higher number of > rounds could the coordinator choose (taking into account the > characteristics of the participant devices) Or simply allow bigger entropy (more than 6 mnemonic words), if the coordinator feels that 64 bit of entropy is not enough.