MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <201507060424.57070.luke@dashjr.org>
References: <CAAUFj10D37A1kfqFNPWz6bOMYSFXQbecJ+RxxOnw6HtwUg70mg@mail.gmail.com>
	<20150703215658.GC5916@muck>
	<CAAUFj11AM3eCX=GDn6384qCi8yKX1jMDF-Jaw2SGemm_HSis9A@mail.gmail.com>
	<201507060424.57070.luke@dashjr.org>
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2015 23:17:03 -0700
Message-ID: <CACq0ZD4PCSXMjZDXNS134ZWTSOaNGktKQd47q+6ncV-uRhS+YQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Aaron Voisine <voisine@gmail.com>
To: Luke Dashjr <luke@dashjr.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c1728e34d6c6051a6b34ad
Cc: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] REQ BIP # / Discuss - Sweep incoming unconfirmed
 transactions with a bounty.
Precedence: list

--001a11c1728e34d6c6051a6b34ad
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Do you have any idea how much hashing power is using CPFP? It's a useful
metric for wallet developers to know what sort of confirmation times they
might be able to get when attempting to use it.


Aaron Voisine
co-founder and CEO
breadwallet.com

On Sun, Jul 5, 2015 at 9:24 PM, Luke Dashjr <luke@dashjr.org> wrote:

> On Monday, July 06, 2015 4:14:14 AM Dan Bryant wrote:
> > When I wrote the BIP proposal I was assuming (incorrectly) that CPFP TX
> > selection was already being done by miners,
>
> No, this is correct. It's just not included in the reference policy.
> Miners are not expected to use the reference policy as-is, and some of
> them do
> in fact use CPFP.
>
> Luke
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>

--001a11c1728e34d6c6051a6b34ad
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr">Do you have any idea how much hashing power is using CPFP?=
 It&#39;s a useful metric for wallet developers to know what sort of confir=
mation times they might be able to get when attempting to use it.</div><div=
 class=3D"gmail_extra"><br clear=3D"all"><div><div class=3D"gmail_signature=
"><div dir=3D"ltr"><div><div dir=3D"ltr"><div><br>Aaron Voisine</div><div>c=
o-founder and CEO<br><a href=3D"http://breadwallet.com" target=3D"_blank">b=
readwallet.com</a></div></div></div></div></div></div>
<br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Sun, Jul 5, 2015 at 9:24 PM, Luke Dashjr =
<span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:luke@dashjr.org" target=3D"_blank">=
luke@dashjr.org</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" =
style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><sp=
an class=3D"">On Monday, July 06, 2015 4:14:14 AM Dan Bryant wrote:<br>
&gt; When I wrote the BIP proposal I was assuming (incorrectly) that CPFP T=
X<br>
&gt; selection was already being done by miners,<br>
<br>
</span>No, this is correct. It&#39;s just not included in the reference pol=
icy.<br>
Miners are not expected to use the reference policy as-is, and some of them=
 do<br>
in fact use CPFP.<br>
<span class=3D"HOEnZb"><font color=3D"#888888"><br>
Luke<br>
</font></span><div class=3D"HOEnZb"><div class=3D"h5">_____________________=
__________________________<br>
bitcoin-dev mailing list<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org">bitcoin-dev@lists.=
linuxfoundation.org</a><br>
<a href=3D"https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev" =
rel=3D"noreferrer" target=3D"_blank">https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mail=
man/listinfo/bitcoin-dev</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>

--001a11c1728e34d6c6051a6b34ad--