Return-Path: <ZmnSCPxj@protonmail.com>
Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org (smtp4.osuosl.org [140.211.166.137])
 by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 778AFC0011
 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
 Mon, 21 Feb 2022 09:02:20 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55C5C408C4
 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
 Mon, 21 Feb 2022 09:02:20 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.297
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.297 tagged_above=-999 required=5
 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
 DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,
 FROM_LOCAL_NOVOWEL=0.5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001,
 SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001]
 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: smtp4.osuosl.org (amavisd-new);
 dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=protonmail.com
Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (smtp4.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id jNzMbjirFg-a
 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
 Mon, 21 Feb 2022 09:02:18 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0
Received: from mail-40137.protonmail.ch (mail-40137.protonmail.ch
 [185.70.40.137])
 by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BF4C6408B3
 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
 Mon, 21 Feb 2022 09:02:18 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2022 09:02:06 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protonmail.com;
 s=protonmail3; t=1645434136;
 bh=8PYPKx65SxikIvNfwbQ+ucSwIaPraq0yCE1r1DFae64=;
 h=Date:To:From:Reply-To:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:
 From:To:Cc:Date:Subject:Reply-To:Feedback-ID:Message-ID;
 b=oCiRZOGhBFIQRz/VQFvbohIDNWEFVB1Ifurefr5RXxNidLw5qrcjDEsTlsdwXVwot
 Zpy17sr40ici80t9YDqKsDCGnVEauOwWe020cSoGLv3JlI5fPqD+gGo5S9vliKWJo/
 pcZ7u462LVf6uuaWJSir4hnfM4Rmeetl6YTuejFn5LMbbwMU0p5wSTM5BXTH05S2kt
 J1dLQaBzi47eNMB4rLOjc7ucxa+tvFb7vnFA3xztBVZX730jbVBoNc72Id5NDYwBpz
 L62Y/OagyvTlNvfDE5BKlv86UDJgcmZ0/bg3RFZNoeuwmCEuZaW2AaHkrU9vHREUhm
 cp++eFXeZjiCQ==
To: Prayank <prayank@tutanota.de>,
 Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
From: ZmnSCPxj <ZmnSCPxj@protonmail.com>
Reply-To: ZmnSCPxj <ZmnSCPxj@protonmail.com>
Message-ID: <guj6poK6x0q2u4ku4nmy_rhAsu33nSIyakg5-_NgAUMAOohUUjwaCgCgjHbcUqzx7Fym8AT6EsQginr9YjglDnwRpQTQwiG0sVQadp7_zhI=@protonmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <MwPDtAD--3-2@tutanota.de>
References: <MtetoOZ--3-2@tutanota.de> <YhAujmus3z69cUl7@petertodd.org>
 <CAJowKgKFeDSA5c5ejLyF7R=kEEAY6dtOY1dNV=6eQG2_Dj7eTg@mail.gmail.com>
 <MwPDtAD--3-2@tutanota.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Stumbling into a contentious soft fork activation
	attempt
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>, 
 <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>, 
 <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2022 09:02:20 -0000

Good morning Prayank,

(offlist)

>  Satoshi

I object to the invocation of Satoshi here, and in general.
If Satoshi wants to participate in Bitcoin development today, he can speak =
for himself.
If Satoshi refuses to participate in Bitcoin development today, who cares w=
hat his opinion is?
Satoshi is dead, long live Bitcoin.


Aside from that, I am otherwise thinking about the various arguments being =
presented.


Regards,
ZmnSCPxj