Received: from sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.194]
	helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
	by sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <gmaxwell@gmail.com>) id 1RtJSN-0005HK-Ra
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Fri, 03 Feb 2012 13:45:39 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com
	designates 209.85.212.47 as permitted sender)
	client-ip=209.85.212.47; envelope-from=gmaxwell@gmail.com;
	helo=mail-vw0-f47.google.com; 
Received: from mail-vw0-f47.google.com ([209.85.212.47])
	by sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76) id 1RtJSJ-00052B-WE
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Fri, 03 Feb 2012 13:45:39 +0000
Received: by vbbff1 with SMTP id ff1so3531533vbb.34
	for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
	Fri, 03 Feb 2012 05:45:30 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.52.72.107 with SMTP id c11mr3127588vdv.48.1328276730552; Fri,
	03 Feb 2012 05:45:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.220.151.200 with HTTP; Fri, 3 Feb 2012 05:45:30 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAB=c7Tp9Mu_-kux8gazysKVFHZaWZdEgsmoOVE+wz-AGYdN-XQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <83F45CA3-D54A-499A-8A20-922CDEE52993@ceptacle.com>
	<CAB=c7Tp9Mu_-kux8gazysKVFHZaWZdEgsmoOVE+wz-AGYdN-XQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2012 08:45:30 -0500
Message-ID: <CAAS2fgQsqnUxtvfE_4f5pWBhn_ifWM2fdNvncb6_AM2YDaO=Sw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell@gmail.com>
To: Aidan Thornton <makosoft@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Score: -1.6 (-)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
	See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
	-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
	sender-domain
	0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
	(gmaxwell[at]gmail.com)
	-0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
	-0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
	author's domain
	0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
	not necessarily valid
	-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
X-Headers-End: 1RtJSJ-00052B-WE
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] 0.5.2 tag in github ??
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2012 13:45:39 -0000

On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 4:52 AM, Aidan Thornton <makosoft@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think that tag's in
> https://gitorious.org/+bitcoin-stable-developers/bitcoin/bitcoind-stable
> - a certain amount of developer politics seems to be involved, and
> v0.5.2 may not have been pushed to the official github repository.

No developer politics are involved=E2=80=94 the cuts to the stable versions
have always been done from Luke's repository simply because he
maintains it.